There is a soul-transforming power in the knowledge of the
nature of Christ. Erroneous views of these foundational principles of faith
lead men into a corrupt faith and a worship that dishonors the Lord instead of
glorifying Him.
In the beginning the Lord Christ was with God and the Lord Christ was God (John 1:1). Here is the most direct and revealing statement of the apostolic faith found in the scripture about the nature of the Lord Christ. The Apostle John sets ink to parchment to record for eternity, the fact of Christ’s divinity against nay sayers that have been spreading through the Churches of Christ. Groups had begun to emerge in and separate from the established Church. These groups vehemently denied the divinity of Jesus. Jude 1:4 (NASB) reports: “For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.”
The Cerinthians, Simonians, and the Gnostics all denied this foundational principle from the beginning of the Church. Each of these groups as well simply vanished away from history because of the stance and unity of the Church.[1]
What makes the divinity of Christ a necessary doctrine of faith? Any doctrine must be tested and tried to be found valid and true. Judgment, either by God or by man, must be made on any presumed knowledge that man would attest. As Irenaeus wrote in the second century: “God will also judge the vain speeches of the perverse Gnostics, by showing that they are the disciples of Simon Magus.”[2] Scripture explains in Matthew 12:36-37: “But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.” Our thoughts, actions, and convictions will receive judgment. The proper understand of the nature of Christ then become imperative.
The scriptures reveal many truths on the divinity of Christ. Jesus himself taught of His divinity and the inspired writers noted this subject on many occasions. Jesus claimed to be equal with God. He applied to Himself titles that were reserved for the Most High God such as “I AM” (John 8:58), “The first and the last” (Exodus 44:6 and Revelation 1:17), and “the judge of all men” (Joel 3:12 and Matthew 25:32). Jesus assumed the roles that were reserved specifically for the one true God.
Jesus taught that he should be honored as God. John 5:23 (KJV) says “That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.” Matthew 8:2 shows how Jesus accepted worship from a man that He had healed from leperacy. Jesus did not correct his actions as he has notably correct people mistakes on other occasions.
Anyone who fails to see the divinity in Jesus then fails to receive the true revelation of God because it is not possible to be called a Christian if you do not share the doctrine of Christ. To not believe what Christ taught about himself then fails to make you a disciple of Christ. They are then only your personal beliefs and not the beliefs of Christianity. “I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.” John 8:24 (KJV)
If Christ was divine then how can He be human? Is not the Creator of universe not sovereign over that universe? Does He not transcend that which He has created? Jesus did not subtract anything from His nature when he was born of a woman but instead He added humanity to himself. The question of Christ’s humanity cannot be understood using a logic of opposites. Jesus does not need to be either human or divine; His humanity is added to His nature so that He partake of the salvation of mankind. The salvation of man depends on Christ’s complete humanity for salvation. “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;” 1 Timothy 2:5 (KJV bold added).
Contained in the Scriptures are the keys to understanding the uniqueness of Christ’s humanity. According to the scriptures, Jesus’ birth was unique yet natural. Jesus was not spontaneously generated as Adam was but was born of virgin woman. This illustrated that Jesus was linked with the same human race but unique in His conception that made Him an uncursed soul as was Adam’s original state. This does not imply original sin but from the moment that any man is born death begins to occur in the body. This is the cursed state of existence that all men, except Christ, are born into. The Bible refers to this state as “slavery to corruption”(Romans 8:21).
His childhood was also one that was also natural in that he was subject to growing into adulthood; yet it was unique in that He was instructing in the temple at the age of 12. His human existence contained within itself all the real attributes of humanity. Flesh, blood, pain, temptation, trials, and physical growth. Hebrews 2:14-15 says “Therefore, since the children share in flesh and blood, He Himself likewise also partook of the same, that through death He might render powerless him who had the power of death, that is, the devil, and might free those who through fear of death were subject to slavery all their lives.” (NASB). To all of the participants of the Nativity, as the child lay in a manager wrapped in swaddling clothes, no one doubted the complete humanity of the Christ.
As was most of His life so was His death both natural and unique. People who are dead for three day generally stay dead. The resurrection of Christ displayed the uniqueness of His humanity in the face of death. His humanity allows all of mankind to receive atonement.
Because He shared in humanity and made us brothers under the Father we can have reconciliation with God. As Hebrews 2:11-12 reads: “For both He who sanctifies and those who are sanctified are all from one Father; for which reason He is not ashamed to call them brethren, saying, "I will proclaim Your name to my brethren, In the midst of the congregation I will sing Your praise." (NASB)
Many who reject the deity of Christ proceed on the assumption that the theology of the Trinity did not appear till AD 200-300. They are half right, the doctrine of the Trinity did not officially get put together until then, but the belief in Jesus being God etc was around before then no doubt they just didn’t classify it as the Trinitarian Doctrine.
In the beginning the Lord Christ was with God and the Lord Christ was God (John 1:1). Here is the most direct and revealing statement of the apostolic faith found in the scripture about the nature of the Lord Christ. The Apostle John sets ink to parchment to record for eternity, the fact of Christ’s divinity against nay sayers that have been spreading through the Churches of Christ. Groups had begun to emerge in and separate from the established Church. These groups vehemently denied the divinity of Jesus. Jude 1:4 (NASB) reports: “For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.”
The Cerinthians, Simonians, and the Gnostics all denied this foundational principle from the beginning of the Church. Each of these groups as well simply vanished away from history because of the stance and unity of the Church.[1]
What makes the divinity of Christ a necessary doctrine of faith? Any doctrine must be tested and tried to be found valid and true. Judgment, either by God or by man, must be made on any presumed knowledge that man would attest. As Irenaeus wrote in the second century: “God will also judge the vain speeches of the perverse Gnostics, by showing that they are the disciples of Simon Magus.”[2] Scripture explains in Matthew 12:36-37: “But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.” Our thoughts, actions, and convictions will receive judgment. The proper understand of the nature of Christ then become imperative.
The scriptures reveal many truths on the divinity of Christ. Jesus himself taught of His divinity and the inspired writers noted this subject on many occasions. Jesus claimed to be equal with God. He applied to Himself titles that were reserved for the Most High God such as “I AM” (John 8:58), “The first and the last” (Exodus 44:6 and Revelation 1:17), and “the judge of all men” (Joel 3:12 and Matthew 25:32). Jesus assumed the roles that were reserved specifically for the one true God.
Jesus taught that he should be honored as God. John 5:23 (KJV) says “That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.” Matthew 8:2 shows how Jesus accepted worship from a man that He had healed from leperacy. Jesus did not correct his actions as he has notably correct people mistakes on other occasions.
Anyone who fails to see the divinity in Jesus then fails to receive the true revelation of God because it is not possible to be called a Christian if you do not share the doctrine of Christ. To not believe what Christ taught about himself then fails to make you a disciple of Christ. They are then only your personal beliefs and not the beliefs of Christianity. “I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.” John 8:24 (KJV)
If Christ was divine then how can He be human? Is not the Creator of universe not sovereign over that universe? Does He not transcend that which He has created? Jesus did not subtract anything from His nature when he was born of a woman but instead He added humanity to himself. The question of Christ’s humanity cannot be understood using a logic of opposites. Jesus does not need to be either human or divine; His humanity is added to His nature so that He partake of the salvation of mankind. The salvation of man depends on Christ’s complete humanity for salvation. “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;” 1 Timothy 2:5 (KJV bold added).
Contained in the Scriptures are the keys to understanding the uniqueness of Christ’s humanity. According to the scriptures, Jesus’ birth was unique yet natural. Jesus was not spontaneously generated as Adam was but was born of virgin woman. This illustrated that Jesus was linked with the same human race but unique in His conception that made Him an uncursed soul as was Adam’s original state. This does not imply original sin but from the moment that any man is born death begins to occur in the body. This is the cursed state of existence that all men, except Christ, are born into. The Bible refers to this state as “slavery to corruption”(Romans 8:21).
His childhood was also one that was also natural in that he was subject to growing into adulthood; yet it was unique in that He was instructing in the temple at the age of 12. His human existence contained within itself all the real attributes of humanity. Flesh, blood, pain, temptation, trials, and physical growth. Hebrews 2:14-15 says “Therefore, since the children share in flesh and blood, He Himself likewise also partook of the same, that through death He might render powerless him who had the power of death, that is, the devil, and might free those who through fear of death were subject to slavery all their lives.” (NASB). To all of the participants of the Nativity, as the child lay in a manager wrapped in swaddling clothes, no one doubted the complete humanity of the Christ.
As was most of His life so was His death both natural and unique. People who are dead for three day generally stay dead. The resurrection of Christ displayed the uniqueness of His humanity in the face of death. His humanity allows all of mankind to receive atonement.
Because He shared in humanity and made us brothers under the Father we can have reconciliation with God. As Hebrews 2:11-12 reads: “For both He who sanctifies and those who are sanctified are all from one Father; for which reason He is not ashamed to call them brethren, saying, "I will proclaim Your name to my brethren, In the midst of the congregation I will sing Your praise." (NASB)
Many who reject the deity of Christ proceed on the assumption that the theology of the Trinity did not appear till AD 200-300. They are half right, the doctrine of the Trinity did not officially get put together until then, but the belief in Jesus being God etc was around before then no doubt they just didn’t classify it as the Trinitarian Doctrine.
Here are source materials available to anyone from the
earliest Christian elders and teachers ad
nauseum:
Barnabas
74 AD The Letter of Barnabas "And further, my brethren,
if the Lord [Jesus] endured to suffer for our soul, he being the Lord of all
the world, to whom God said at the foundation of the world, 'Let us make man
after our image, and after our likeness,' understand how it was that he endured
to suffer at the hand of men" (Letter of Barnabas 5).
The Huleatt Manuscript
The Huleatt Manuscript (contested between 50 AD and 200 AD)
"She poured it [the perfume] over his [Jesus'] hair when he sat at the
table. But, when the disciples saw it, they were indignant. . . . God, aware of
this, said to them: 'Why do you trouble this woman? She has done [a beautiful
thing for me.] . . . Then one of the Twelve, who was called Judas Iscariot, went
to the chief priest and said, 'What will you give me for my work?' [Matt.
26:7-15]" (Huleatt fragments 1-3).
Hermas
80 AD Hermas "The Son of God is older than all his
creation, so that he became the Father's adviser in his creation. Therefore
also he is ancient" (The Shepherd 12).
Aristides
140 AD Aristides "[Christians] are they who, above
every people of the Earth, have found the truth, for they acknowledge God, the
creator and maker of all things, in the only-begotten Son and in the Holy
Spirit" (Apology 16).
150 AD Justin Martyr
150 AD Justin Martyr "The Father of the universe has a
Son, who also being the first begotten Word of God, is even God." (Justin
Martyr, First Apology, ch 63)
150 AD Justin Martyr "Christ is called both God and
Lord of hosts." (Dialogue with Trypho, ch, 36)
150 AD Justin Martyr "Moreover, in the diapsalm of the
forty-sixth Psalm, reference is thus made to Christ: 'God went up with a shout,
the Lord with the sound of a trumpet." (Dialogue with Trypho, ch 37)
150 AD Justin Martyr quotes Hebrews 1:8 to prove the Deity
of Christ. "Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever." (Dialogue with
Trypho, ch 56)
150 AD Justin Martyr "Therefore these words testify
explicitly that He [Christ] is witnessed to by Him who established these
things, as deserving to be worshipped, as God and as Christ." - Dialogue
with Trypho, ch. 63.
150 AD Justin Martyr in Chap. LXVI. He (Justin) Proves From
Isaiah That God Was Born From A Virgin. (Chapter Title, Chap. LXVI)
150 AD Justin Martyr "And Trypho said, "You
endeavor to prove an incredible and well-nigh impossible thing;[namely], that
God endured to be born and become man...some Scriptures which we mention, and
which expressly prove that Christ was to suffer, to be worshipped, and [to be
called] God, and which I have already recited to you, do refer indeed to
Christ." (Dialogue with Trypho, ch 68)
150 AD Justin Martyr "But if you knew, Trypho,"
continued I, "who He is that is called at one time the Angel of great
counsel, and a Man by Ezekiel, and like the Son of man by Daniel, and a Child
by Isaiah, and Christ and God to be worshipped by David, and Christ and a Stone
by many, and Wisdom by Solomon, and Joseph and Judah and a Star by Moses, and
the East by Zechariah, and the Suffering One and Jacob and Israel by Isaiah
again, and a Rod, and Flower, and Corner Stone, and Son of God, you would not
have blasphemed Him who has now come, and been born, and suffered, and ascended
to heaven; who shall also come again, and then your twelve tribes shall mourn.
For if you had understood what has been written by the prophets, you would not
have denied that He was God, Son of the only, unbegotten, unutterable God. For
Moses says somewhere in Exodus the following: `The Lord spake to Moses, and
said to him, I am the Lord, and I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob,
being their God; and my name I revealed not to them, and I established my
covenant with them.' And thus again he says, `A man wrestled with Jacob,' and
asserts it was God; narrating that Jacob said, `I have seen God face to face,
and my life is preserved.'" (Dialogue of Justin with Trypho, A Jew, Chap.
CXXVI [See also The First Apology of Justin, Chap. XIII; XXII; LXIII; Dialogue
of Justin with Trypho, A Jew, Chap. XXXVI; XLVIII; LVI; LIX; LXI; C; CV; CXXV;
CXXVIII)
[Trypho to Justin] "...you say that
this Christ existed as God before the ages, and that He submitted to be born
and become man" - Dialogue with Trypho, ch.48.
150 AD Justin Martyr "We will prove that we worship him
reasonably; for we have learned that he is the Son of the true God Himself,
that he holds a second place, and the Spirit of prophecy a third. For this they
accuse us of madness, saying that we attribute to a crucified man a place
second to the unchangeable and eternal God, the Creator of all things; but they
are ignorant of the Mystery which lies therein" (First Apology 13:5-6).
150 AD Justin Martyr "Jesus Christ is the only proper
Son who has been begotten by God, being His Word and first-begotten, and power;
and, becoming man according to His will, He taught us these things for the
conversion and restoration of the human race" (First Apology 23).
150 AD Justin Martyr "But both Him, and the Son (who
came forth from Him and taught us these things, and the host of the other good
angels who follow and are made like to Him), and the prophetic Spirit, we
worship and adore." (Justin Martyr, First Apology, ch 6) Notice what else
Justin say: "Worship God alone." (Justin Martyr, First Apology, ch
16) "Whence to God alone we render worship." (Justin Martyr, First
Apology, ch 17)
150 AD Justin Martyr "God begot before all creatures a
Beginning, who was a certain rational power from himself and whom the Holy
Spirit calls . . . sometimes the Son, . . . sometimes Lord and Word ... We see
things happen similarly among ourselves, for whenever we utter some word, we
beget a word, yet not by any cutting off, which would diminish the word in us
when we utter it. We see a similar occurrence when one fire enkindles another.
It is not diminished through the enkindling of the other, but remains as it
was" (Dialogue with Trypho the Jew 61).
150 AD Justin Martyr "God speaks in the creation of man
with the very same design, in the following words: 'Let us make man after our
image and likeness' . . . I shall quote again the words narrated by Moses
himself, from which we can indisputably learn that [God] conversed with someone
numerically distinct from himself and also a rational being. . . . But this
Offspring who was truly brought forth from the Father, was with the Father
before all the creatures, and the Father communed with him" (Dialogue with
Trypho the Jew 62).
150 AD Justin Martyr "HOW GOD APPEARED TO MOSES. And
all the Jews even now teach that the nameless God spake to Moses; whence the
Spirit of prophecy, accusing them by Isaiah the prophet mentioned above, said
"The ox knoweth his owner, and the ass his master's crib; but Israel doth
not know Me, and My people do not understand." And Jesus the Christ,
because the Jews knew not what the Father was, and what the Son, in like manner
accused them; and Himself said, "No one knoweth the Father, but the Son;
nor the Son, but the Father, and they to whom the Son revealeth Him." Now
the Word of God is His Son, as we have before said. And He is called Angel and
Apostle; for He declares whatever we ought to know, and is sent forth to
declare whatever is revealed; as our Lord Himself says, "He that heareth
Me, heareth Him that sent Me." From the writings of Moses also this will
be manifest; for thus it is written in them, "And the Angel of God spake
to Moses, in a flame of fire out of the bush, and said, I am that I am, the God
of Abraham, the God of Isaac, the God of Jacob, the God of thy fathers; go down
into Egypt, and bring forth My people." And if you wish to learn what
follows, you can do so from the same writings; for it is impossible to relate
the whole here. But so much is written for the sake of proving that Jesus the
Christ is the Son of God and His Apostle, being of old the Word, and appearing
sometimes in the form of fire, and sometimes in the likeness of angels; but
now, by the will of God, having become man for the human race, He endured all
the sufferings which the devils instigated the senseless Jews to inflict upon
Him; who, though they have it expressly affirmed in the writings of Moses,
"And the angel of God spake to Moses in a flame of fire in a bush, and
said, I am that I am, the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of
Jacob," yet maintain that He who said this was the Father and Creator of
the universe. Whence also the Spirit of prophecy rebukes them, and says,
"Israel doth not know Me, my people have not understood Me." And
again, Jesus, as we have already shown, while He was with them, said, "No
one knoweth the Father, but the Son; nor the Son but the Father, and those to
whom the Son will reveal Him." The Jews, accordingly, being throughout of
opinion that it was the Father of the universe who spake to Moses, though He
who spake to him was indeed the Son of God, who is called both Angel and
Apostle, are justly charged, both by the Spirit of prophecy and by Christ
Himself, with knowing neither the Father nor the Son. For they who affirm that
the Son is the Father, are proved neither to have become acquainted with the
Father, nor to know that the Father of the universe has a Son; who also, being
the first-begotten Word of God, is even God. And of old He appeared in the
shape of fire and in the likeness of an angel to Moses and to the other
prophets; but now in the times of your reign, having, as we before said, become
Man by a virgin, according to the counsel of the Father, for the salvation of
those who believe on Him, He endured both to be set at nought and to suffer,
that by dying and rising again He might conquer death. And that which was said
out of the bush to Moses, "I am that I am, the God of Abraham, and the God
of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, and the God of your fathers," this
signified that they, even though dead, are let in existence, and are men
belonging to Christ Himself. For they were the first of all men to busy
themselves in the search after God; Abraham being the father of Isaac, and
Isaac of Jacob, as Moses wrote." (Justin Martyr, First Apology, ch 63)
150 AD Justin Martyr
"It is not on this ground solely," I said, "that it must be
admitted absolutely that some other one is called Lord by the Holy Spirit
besides Him who is considered Maker of all things; not solely [for what is
said] by Moses, but also [for what is said] by David. For there is written by
him: 'The Lord says to my Lord, Sit on My right hand, until I make Thine
enemies Thy footstool,' as I have already quoted. And again, in other words:
'Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever." (Dialog of Justin with Trypho, a
Jew, ch 56)
150 AD Justin Martyr "Then I replied, "Reverting
to the Scriptures, I shall endeavor to persuade you, that He who is said to
have appeared to Abraham, and to Jacob, and to Moses, and who is called God, is
distinct from Him who made all things, — numerically, I mean, not [distinct] in
will. For I affirm that He has never at any time done anything which He who
made the world — above whom there is no other God — has not wished Him both to
do and to engage Himself with." (Dialog of Justin with Trypho, a Jew, ch
56)
150 AD Justin Martyr "... even so here, the Scripture,
in announcing that the Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses, and in afterwards
declaring him to be Lord and God, speaks of the same One, whom it declares by
the many testimonies already quoted to be minister to God, who is above the
world, above whom there is no other [God]." (Dialog of Justin with Trypho,
a Jew, ch 60)
150 AD Justin Martyr
"I shall give you another testimony, my friends," said I, "from
the Scriptures, that God begat before all creatures a Beginning, [who was] a
certain rational power [proceeding] from Himself, who is called by the Holy
Spirit, now the Glory of the Lord, now the Son, again Wisdom, again an Angel,
then God, and then Lord and Logos; and on another occasion He calls Himself
Captain, when He appeared in human form to Joshua the son of Nave (Nun). For He
can be called by all those names, since He ministers to the Father's will, and
since He was begotten of the Father by an act of will; just as we see happening
among ourselves: for when we give out some word, we beget the word; yet not by
abscission, so as to lessen the word [which remains] in us, when we give it
out: and just as we see also happening in the case of a fire, which is not
lessened when it has kindled [another], but remains the same; and that which
has been kindled by it likewise appears to exist by itself, not diminishing
that from which it was kindled. The Word of Wisdom, who is Himself this God
begotten of the Father of all things, and Word, and Wisdom, and Power, and the
Glory of the Begetter, ..." (Dialog of Justin with Trypho, a Jew, ch 60)
150 AD Polycarp of Smyrna
150 AD Polycarp of Smyrna "I praise you for all things,
I bless you, I glorify you, along with the everlasting and heavenly Jesus
Christ, your beloved Son, with whom, to you and the Holy Spirit, be glory both
now and to all coming ages. Amen" (Martyrdom of Polycarp 14).
160 AD Mathetes
160 AD Mathetes "[The Father] sent the Word that he
might be manifested to the world . . . This is he who was from the beginning,
who appeared as if new, and was found old . . . This is he who, being from
everlasting, is today called the Son" (Letter to Diognetus 11).
170 AD Tatian the Syrian
170 AD Tatian the Syrian "We are not playing the fool,
you Greeks, nor do we talk nonsense, when we report that God was born in the
form of a man" (Address to the Greeks 21).
177 AD Athenagoras
177 AD Athenagoras "The Son of God is the Word of the
Father in thought and actuality. By him and through him all things were made,
the Father and the Son being one. Since the Son is in the Father and the Father
is in the Son by the unity and power of the Spirit, the Mind and Word of the
Father is the Son of God. And if, in your exceedingly great wisdom, it occurs
to you to inquire what is meant by `the Son,' I will tell you briefly: He is
the first- begotten of the Father, not as having been produced, for from the
beginning God had the Word in himself, God being eternal mind and eternally
rational, but as coming forth to be the model and energizing force of all
material things" (Plea for the Christians 10:2-4).
177 AD Melito of Sardis
177 AD Melito of Sardis "It is no way necessary in
dealing with persons of intelligence to adduce the actions of Christ after his
baptism as proof that his soul and his body, his human nature, were like ours,
real and not phantasmal. The activities of Christ after his baptism, and
especially his miracles, gave indication and assurance to the world of the
deity hidden in his flesh. Being God and likewise perfect man, he gave positive
indications of his two natures: of his deity, by the miracles during the three
years following after his baptism, of his humanity, in the thirty years which
came before his baptism, during which, by reason of his condition according to
the flesh, he concealed the signs of his deity, although he was the true God
existing before the ages" (Fragment in Anastasius of Sinai's The Guide
13).
180 AD Theophilus of Antioch
180 AD Theophilus of Antioch Chapter XV. - Of the Fourth
Day. "On the fourth day the luminaries were made; because God, who
possesses foreknowledge, knew the follies of the vain philosophers, that they
were going to say, that the things which grow on the earth are produced from
the heavenly bodies, so as to exclude God. In order, therefore, that the truth
might be obvious, the plants and seeds were produced prior to the heavenly
bodies, for what is posterior cannot produce that which is prior. And these
contain the pattern and type of a great mystery. For the sun is a type of God,
and the moon of man. And as the sun far surpasses the moon in power and glory,
so far does God surpass man. And as the sun remains ever full, never becoming
less, so does God always abide perfect, being full of all power, and
understanding, and wisdom, and immortality, and all good. But the moon wanes
monthly, and in a manner dies, being a type of man; then it is born again, and
is crescent, for a pattern of the future resurrection. In like manner also the
three days which were before the luminaries, are types of the Trinity,. of God,
and His Word, and His wisdom." [Triavdo" The earliest use of this
word "Trinity." It seems to have been used by this writer in his lost
works, also; and, as a learned friends suggests, the use he makes of it is
familiar. He does not lug it in as something novel: "types of the
Trinity," he says, illustrating an accepted word, not introducing a new
one.] "And the fourth is the type of man, who needs light, that so there
may be God, the Word, wisdom, man. Wherefore also on the fourth day the lights
were made. The disposition of the stars, too, contains a type of the arrangement
and order of the righteous and pious, and of those who keep the law and
commandments of God. For the brilliant and bright stars are an imitation of the
prophets, and therefore they remain fixed, not declining, nor passing from
place to place. And those which hold the second place in brightness, are types
of the people of the righteous. And those, again, which change their position,
and flee from place to place, which also are cared planets, they too are a type
of the men who have wandered from God, abandoning His law and
commandments." (180 AD, Theophilus of Antioch Chapter XV. - Of the Fourth
Day, To Autolycus 2:15)
180 AD Irenaeus
180 AD Irenaeus "...so that He indeed who made all
things can alone, together with His Word, properly be termed God and Lord: but
the things which have been made cannot have this term applied to them, neither
should they justly assume that appellation which belongs to the Creator."
- Against Heresies, Book III, ch. 8, section 3.
180 AD Irenaeus "But the Son, eternally co-existing
with the Father, from of old, yea, from the beginning, always reveals the
Father to Angels, Archangels, Powers, Virtues..." (Against Heresies, Book
II, ch. 30, section 9)
180 AD Irenaeus "Christ Jesus is our Lord, and God, and
Savior, and King." (Against Heresies, Book I, ch. 10, section 1)
180 AD Irenaeus "For I have shown from the scriptures,
that no one of the sons of Adam is as to everything, and absolutely, called
God, or named Lord. But that He is Himself in His own right, beyond all men who
ever lived, God, and Lord, and King Eternal, and the Incarnate Word, proclaimed
by all the prophets, the apostles, and by the Spirit Himself, may be seen by
all who have attained to even a small portion of the truth. Now, the scriptures
would not have testified these things of Him, if, like others, He had been a
mere man. (Irenaeus Against Heresies, chapter xix.2)
180 AD Irenaeus
"For the Church, although dispersed throughout the whole world even to the
ends of the Earth, has received from the apostles and from their disciples the
faith in one God, Father Almighty, the creator of heaven and Earth and sea and
all that is in them; and in one Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who became flesh
for our salvation; and in the Holy Spirit, who announced through the prophets
the dispensations and the comings, and the birth from a Virgin, and the
passion, and the Resurrection from the dead, and the bodily Ascension into
heaven of the beloved Christ Jesus our Lord, and his coming from heaven in the
glory of the Father to re-establish all things; and the raising up again of all
flesh of all humanity, in order that to Jesus Christ our Lord and God and
Savior and King, in accord with the approval of the invisible Father, every
knee shall bend of those in heaven and on Earth and under the earth . . .
" (Against Heresies 1:10:1).
180 AD Irenaeus "[The Gnostics] transfer the generation
of the uttered word of men to the eternal Word of God, attributing to him a
beginning of utterance and a coming into being . . . In what manner, then,
would the word of God--indeed, the great God himself, since he is the
Word--differ from the word of men?" (Against Heresies 2:13:8).
180 AD Irenaeus "Nevertheless, what cannot be said of
anyone else who ever lived, that he is himself in his own right God and Lord .
. . may be seen by all who have attained to even a small portion of the
truth" (Against Heresies, 3:19:1).
180 AD Irenaeus "It was not angels, therefore, who made
us, nor who formed us, neither had angels power to make an image of God, nor
any one else, except the Word of the Lord, nor any Power remotely distant from
the Father of all things. For God did not stand in need of these [beings], in
order to the accomplishing of what He had Himself determined with Himself
beforehand should be done, as if He did not possess His own hands. For with Him
were always present the Word and Wisdom, the Son and the Spirit, by whom and in
whom, freely and spontaneously, He made all things, to whom also He speaks,
saying, "Let Us make man after Our image and likeness; " [Gen.
1:26]" (Against Heresies 4:20:1).
180 AD Irenaeus [Quoting John 1:1] "'...and the Word
was God,' of course, for that which is begotten of God is God." (Against
Heresies, Book I, ch. 8, section 5)
180 AD Irenaeus "And again when the Son speaks to
Moses, He says, 'I am come down to deliver this people,' (Exodus 3:8 - the
burning bush). For it is He who descended and ascended for the salvation of
men." (Against Heresies, Book III, ch. 6, section 2)
180 AD Irenaeus "Proofs From The Apostolic Writings,
That Jesus Christ Was One And The Same, The Only Begotten Son Of God, Perfect
God And Perfect Man." (Against Heresies, Book III, ch. 16, Chapter Title)
180 AD Irenaeus [in reference to Jesus] "For I have
shown from the Scriptures, that no one of the sons of Adam is as to everything,
and absolutely, called God, or named Lord. But that He is Himself in His own
right, beyond all men who ever lived, God, and Lord, and King Eternal, and the
Incarnate Word, proclaimed by all the prophets, the apostles, and by the Spirit
Himself,...Now, the Scriptures would not have testified these things of Him,
if, like others, He had been a mere man." (Against Heresies, Book III, ch.
19, section 2)
180 AD Irenaeus "God, then, was made man, and the Lord
did Himself save us, giving us the token of the Virgin." (Against
Heresies, Book III, ch. 21, section 1)
180 AD Irenaeus "Christ Himself, therefore, together
with the Father, is the God of the living, who spake to Moses, and who was also
manifested to the fathers." (Against Heresies, Book IV, ch. 5, section 2)
180 AD Irenaeus "And for this reason all spake with
Christ when He was present [upon earth], and they named Him God." (Against
Heresies, Book IV, ch.6, section 6)
180 AD Irenaeus "God formed man...it was not angels,
therefore, who made us...neither had angels power to make an image of
God." (Against Heresies, Book IV, ch. 20, section 1)
180 AD Irenaeus "Wherefore the prophets, receiving the
prophetic gift from the same Word, announced His advent according to the flesh,
by which the blending and communion of God and man took place according to the
good pleasure of the Father, the Word of God foretelling from the beginning
that God should be seen by men, and hold converse with them upon earth."
(Against Heresies, Book IV, ch. 20, section 4)
180 AD Irenaeus "The Word, that is, the Son, was always
with the Father." (Against Heresies, Book IV, ch. 20, section 3)
180 AD Irenaeus "Christ Jesus, the Son of God, because
of His surpassing love for His creation, condescended to be born of the
virgin." (Against Heresies, Book III, ch. 4, section 2)
180 AD Irenaeus "Therefore neither would the Lord, nor
the Holy Spirit, nor the apostles, have ever named as God, definitely and
absolutely, him who was not God, unless he were truly God; nor would they have
named any one in his own person Lord, except God the Father ruling over all,
and His Son who has received dominion from His Father over all creation, as
this passage has it: "The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit Thou at my right
hand, until I make Thine enemies Thy footstool." Here the [Scripture]
represents to us the Father addressing the Son; He who gave Him the inheritance
of the heathen, and subjected to Him all His enemies. Since, therefore, the
Father is truly Lord, and the Son truly Lord, the Holy Spirit has fitly
designated them by the title of Lord. And again, referring to the destruction
of the Sodomites, the Scripture says, "Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and
upon Gomorrah fire and brimstone from the LORD out of heaven." For it here
points out that the Son, who had also been talking with Abraham, had received
power to judge the Sodomites for their wickedness. And this [text following]
does declare the same truth: "Thy throne, O God; is forever and ever; the
scepter of Thy kingdom is a right scepter. Thou hast loved righteousness, and
hated iniquity: therefore God, Thy God, hath anointed Thee." For the Spirit
designates both [of them] by the name, of God — both Him who is anointed as
Son, and Him who does anoint, that is, the Father." (Book 3, ch 6)
190 AD Clement Of Alexandria
190 AD Clement Of Alexandria [note: Clement NEVER
calls Jesus a creature.] "There was then, a Word importing an unbeginning
eternity; as also the Word itself, that is, the Son of God, who being, by
equality of substance, one with the Father, is eternal and uncreated."
(Fragments, Part I, section III) "that so great a work was accomplished in
so brief a space by the Lord, who, though despised as to appearance, was in
reality adored, the expiator of sin, the Saviour, the clement, the Divine Word,
He that is truly most manifest Deity, He that is made equal to the Lord of the
universe; because He was His Son, and the Word was in God, not disbelieved in
by all when He was first preached, nor altogether unknown when, assuming the
character of man, and fashioning Himself in flesh, He enacted the drama of
human salvation: for He was a true champion and a fellow-champion with [ie. God
among creatures, not that Jesus is classed as a creature] the creature."
(Exhortations, Chap 10)
190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "I understand nothing else
than the Holy Trinity to be meant; for the third is the Holy Spirit, and the
Son is the second, by whom all things were made according to the will of the
Father." (Stromata, Book V, ch. 14)
190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "When [John] says: 'What
was from the beginning [1 John 1:1],' he touches upon the generation without
beginning of the Son, who is co-equal with the Father. 'Was,' therefore, is
indicative of an eternity without a beginning, just as the Word Himself, that
is the Son, being one with the Father in regard to equality of substance, is
eternal and uncreated. That the word always existed is signified by the saying:
'In the beginning was the Word' [John 1:1]." (fragment in Eusebius
History, Bk 6 Ch 14; Jurgens, p. 188)
190 AD Clement Of Alexandria 'For both are one — that is,
God. For He has said, "In the beginning the Word was in God, and the Word
was God." (The Instructor, Book 1, ch 8)
190 AD Clement of Alexandria "Despised as to appearance
but in reality adored, [Jesus is] the Expiator, the Savior, the Soother, the
Divine Word, he that is quite evidently true God, he that is put on a level
with the Lord of the universe because he was his Son." (Exhortation to the
Greeks, 10:110:1).
190 AD Clement of Alexandria "The Word, then, the
Christ, is the cause both of our ancient beginning, for lie was in God, and of
our well-being. And now this same Word has appeared as man. He alone is both
God and man, and the source of all our good things" (Exhortation to the
Greeks 1:7:1).
190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "Now, O you, my children,
our Instructor is like His Father God, whose son He is, sinless, blameless, and
with a soul devoid of passion; God in the form of man, stainless, the minister
of His Father's will, the Word who is God, who is in the Father, who is at the
Father's right hand, and with the form of God is God." (Instructor, Book
I, ch. 2)
190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "His Son Jesus, the Word
of God, is our Instructor.... He is God and Creator." (Instructor, Book I,
ch. 11)
190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "This is the New Song, the
manifestation of the Word that was in the beginning, and before the beginning.
The Savior, who existed before, has in recent days appeared. He, who is in Him
that truly is, has appeared; for the Word, who "was with God," and by
whom all things were created, has appeared as our Teacher. The Word, who in the
beginning bestowed on us life as Creator when He formed us, taught us to live
well when He appeared as our Teacher; that as God He might afterwards conduct
us to the life which never ends." (Exhortation To The Heathen, ch 2)
190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "This Word, then, the
Christ, the cause of both our being at first (for He was in God) and of our
well-being, this very Word has now appeared as man, He alone being both, both
God and man" (Exhortation To The Heathen, ch 2)
190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "For it was not without
divine care that so great a work was accomplished in so brief a space by the
Lord, who, though despised as to appearance, was in reality adored, the
expiator of sin, the Savior, the clement, the Divine Word, He that is truly
most manifest Deity, He that is made [made = appointed not created, ie. made
king after resurrection.] equal to the Lord of the universe; because He was His
Son, and the Word was in God, not disbelieved in by all when He was first
preached, nor altogether unknown when, assuming the character of man, and
fashioning Himself in flesh" (Exhortation To The Heathen, ch 10)
190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "Now, O you, my children,
our Instructor is like His Father God, whose son He is, sinless, blameless, and
with a soul devoid of passion; God in the form of man, stainless, the minister
of His Father's will, the Word who is God, who is in the Father, who is at the
Father's right hand, and with the form of God is God." (The Instructor,
Book 1, ch 2)
200 AD Tertullian
200 AD Tertullian "Never did any angel descend for the
purpose of being crucified, of tasting death, and of rising again from the
dead." (The Flesh of Christ, ch 6)
200 AD Tertullian "All the Scriptures give clear proof
of the Trinity, and it is from these that our principle is deduced...the
distinction of the Trinity is quite clearly displayed." (Against Praxeas,
ch 11)
200 AD Tertullian "The origins of both his substances
display him as man and as God: from the one, born, and from the other, not
born" (The Flesh of Christ, 5:6-7).
200 AD Tertullian "[God speaks in the plural 'Let us
make man in our image'] because already there was attached to Him his Son, a
second person, his own Word, and a third, the Spirit in the Word....one
substance in three coherent persons. He was at once the Father, the Son, and
the Spirit." (Against Praxeas, ch 12)
200 AD Tertullian "Thus the connection of the Father in
the Son, and of the Son in the Paraclete, produces three coherent Persons, who
are yet distinct One from Another. These Three are, one essence, not one
Person, as it is said, 'I and my Father are One' [John 10:30], in respect of
unity of Being not singularity of number" (Against Praxeas, 25)
200 AD Tertullian "As if in this way also one were not
All, in that All are of One, by unity (that is) of substance; while the mystery
of the dispensation is still guarded, which distributes the Unity into a Trinity,
placing in their order the three Persons — the Father, the Son, and the Holy
Ghost: three, however, not in condition, but in degree; not in substance, but
in form; not in power, but in aspect; yet of one substance, and of one
condition, and of one power, inasmuch as He is one God, from whom these degrees
and forms and aspects are reckoned, under the name of the Father, and of the
Son, and of the Holy Ghost." (Against Praxeas, by Tertullian)
200 AD Tertullian "So too, that which has come forth
out of God is at once God and the Son of God; and the two are one.... In his
birth he is God and man united." (Apology, ch 21)
200 AD Tertullian "There is one only God, but under the
following dispensation, or oikonomia, as it is called, that this one only God
has also a Son, His Word, who proceeded from Himself, by whom all things were
made, and without whom nothing was made. Him we believe to have been sent by
the Father into the Virgin, and to have been born of her — being both Man and
God, the Son of Man and the Son of God, and to have been called by the name of
Jesus Christ; we believe Him to have suffered, died, and been buried, according
to the Scriptures, and, after He had been raised again by the Father and taken
back to heaven, to be sitting at the right hand of the Father, and that He will
come to judge the quick and the dead; who sent also from heaven from the
Father, according to His own promise, the Holy Ghost, the Paraclete, the
sanctifier of the faith of those who believe in the Father, and in the Son, and
in the Holy Ghost. That this rule of faith has come down to us from the
beginning of the gospel, even before any of the older heretics." (Against
Praxeas, ch 2)
200 AD Tertullian "That there are two Gods and two
Lords, however, is a statement which we will never allow to issue from our
mouth; not as if the Father and the Son were not God, nor the Spirit God, and
each of them God; but formerly two were spoken of as Gods and two as Lords, so
that when Christ would come, he might both be acknowledged as God and be called
Lord, because he is the Son of him who is both God and Lord" (Against
Praxeas 13:6)
200 AD Tertullian "The Spirit is God, and the Word is
God, because proceeding from God, but yet is not actually the very same as He from
whom He proceeds.." (Against Praxeas, ch 26)
200 AD Tertullian "For He could not have been the
Father previous to the Son, nor a judge previous to sin" (Against
Hermogones, Ch 3)
200 AD Tertullian "He will be God, and the Word - the
Son of God. We see plainly the twofold state, which is not confounded, but
conjoined in One Person - Jesus, God and Man.." (Against Praxeas, ch 27)
200 AD Tertullian "God alone is without sin. The only
man who is without sin is Christ; for Christ is also God" (The Soul 41:3)
200 AD Tertullian "We do indeed believe that there is
only one God, but we believe that under this dispensation, or, as we say,
oikonomia, there is also a Son of this one only God, his Word, who proceeded
from him and through whom all things were made and without whom nothing was
made. . . . We believe he was sent down by the Father, in accord with his own
promise, the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, the Sanctifier of the faith of those
who believe in the Father and the Son, and in the Holy Spirit. . . . this rule
of faith has been present since the beginning of the Gospel, before even the
earlier heretics" ... "And at the same time the mystery of the
oikonomia is safeguarded, for the unity is distributed in a Trinity. Placed in order,
the Three are the Father, Son, and Spirit. They are three, however, not in
condition, but in degree; not in Being, but in form; not in power, but in kind;
of one Being, however, and one condition and one power, because he is one God
of whom degrees and forms and kinds are taken into account in the name of the
Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit" (Against Praxeas 2).
200 AD Tertullian "While keeping to this demurrer
always, there must, nevertheless, be place for reviewing for the sake of the
instruction and protection of various persons. Otherwise it might seem that
each perverse opinion is not examined but simply prejudged and condemned. This
is especially so in the case of the present heresy [Sabellianism], which
considers itself to have the pure truth when it supposes that one cannot
believe in the one only God in any way other than by saying that Father, Son,
and Spirit are the selfsame person. As if one were not all . . . through the
unity of substance" (Against Praxeas 2:3-4)
200 AD Tertullian "Keep always in mind the rule of
faith which I profess and by which I bear witness that the Father and the Son
and the Spirit are inseparable from each other, and then you will understand
what is meant by it. Observe now that I say the Father is other [distinct], the
Son is other, and the Spirit is other. This statement is wrongly understood by
every uneducated or perversely disposed individual, as if it meant diversity
and implied by that diversity a separation of Father, Son, and Holy
Spirit" (Against Praxeas, 9)
200 AD Tertullian "[W]hen God says, 'Let there be
light' [Gen. 1:3], this is the perfect nativity of the Word, while he is
proceeding from God. . . . Thus, the Father makes him equal to himself, and the
Son, by proceeding from him, was made the first-begotten, since he was begotten
before all things, and the only-begotten, because he alone was begotten of God,
in a manner peculiar to himself, from the womb of his own heart, to which even
the Father himself gives witness: 'My heart has poured forth my finest Word'
[Ps. 45:1Against Praxeas 7:1).
200 AD Tertullian "... it is not by division that He is
different, but by distinction; because the Father is not the same as the Son,
since they differ one from the other in the mode of their being. For the Father
is the entire substance, but the Son is a derivation and portion of the whole,
as He Himself acknowledges: "My Father is greater than I." In the
Psalm His inferiority is described as being "a little lower than the angels."
Thus the Father is distinct from the Son, being greater than the Son, inasmuch
as He who begets is one, and He who is begotten is another; He, too, who sends
is one, and He who is sent is another" (Against Praxeas, by Tertullian)
200 AD Tertullian [Just as Jehovah’s Witnesses attribute
words to Tertullian that he never said. We draw your attention to the fact that
the quoted words (from "Should you believe in the trinity",
Watchtower booklet), "There was a time when the Son was not" are not
Tertullian's, but those of Bishop Kaye in his appendix section on Tertullian.
(Bishop Kaye, Account of the Writings of Tertullian, Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol
3, p 1181). Kaye, Tertullian, some Trinitarians and all Modalists teach that
Jesus was eternally pre-existent as God, and that the title of "Son"
was first applied to Jesus after his incarnation. Just as a man cannot be
called a father, until after he has a son, so too Jesus cannot be called a Son
until after he was physically born via incarnation. This is the gist of what
Kaye is saying Tertullian taught. To support this, notice this comment by
Tertullian,] "For He could not have been the Father previous to the Son,
nor a judge previous to sin" (Against Hermogones, Ch 3) see next quote:
200 AD Tertullian Because God is in like manner a Father,
and He is also a Judge; but He has not always been Father and Judge, merely on
the ground of His having always been God. For He could not have been the Father
previous to the Son, nor a Judge previous to sin. There was, however, a time
when neither sin existed with Him, nor the Son; the former of which was to
constitute the Lord a Judge, and the latter a Father. In this way He was not
Lord previous to those things of which He was to be the Lord. But He was only
to become Lord at some future time: just as He became the Father by the Son,
and a Judge by sin, so also did He become Lord by means of those things which
He had made, in order that they might serve Him. (Tertullian, Against
Hermogenes, chapter 3)
200 AD Tertullian "For before all things God was alone
— being in Himself and for Himself universe, and space, and all things.
Moreover, He was alone, because there was nothing external to Him but Himself.
Yet even not then was He alone; for He had with Him that which He possessed in
Himself, that is to say, His own Reason. For God is rational, and Reason was
first in Him; and so all things were from Himself. This Reason is His own
Thought (or Consciousness) which the Greeks call , by which term we also designate
Word or Discourse and therefore it is now usual with our people, owing to the
mere simple interpretation of the term, to say that the Word was in the
beginning with God;" (Against Praxeas, by Tertullian)
The non-Trinitarians make very good points regarding the
apparent limitation of Christ while on earth. The basic student of scripture
may fall into the trap when non-Trinitarians argue that if Jesus was also the
all knowing God then why does he not know the day for the second coming. Scripture
also discusses these issues as well. It is because God in His very nature
cannot be seen, tempted, nor physically die to pay for the sins of mankind, it
was necessary for Jesus to add a human nature to His Divine person so that He
could redeem mankind. Philippians 2:5-10 says: "Let this mind be in
you, which was also in Christ Jesus: Who, being in the form of God, thought it
not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took
upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being
found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death,
even the death of the cross. Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and
given him a name which is above every name: That at the name of Jesus every knee
should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the
earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the
glory of God the Father." (KJV) This explains how Jesus continued to exist
in God’s “form” (i.e., nature), but relinquished His right to enjoy equality
with God so that He could limit Himself to the human nature he had adopted in
order to redeem mankind. Thus, by adding a human dimension to His Divine
person, Jesus became the visible “image of the invisible God” (Colossians
1:15).
Work Cited
[1] Sisters of Notre Dame de Namu, Compendium of Church History, BiblioBazaar, LLC, 2009, pg 31
[2] Bercot, David, A Dictionary of Early Christian Beliefs, Hendrickson Publishing, 2006 pg. 615